What’s the issue?
Too often agroecology is being used as an ‘umbrella term’ for different types of sustainable or nature-friendly farming. But this loose definition, which uproots it from its political context, is leaving it vulnerable to being co-opted and used as greenwash by policymakers, big business, and even far-right groups.
Time and time again we see large agricultural and food retail companies using the language of agroecology; claiming to invest in ‘regenerating nature’ and ‘protecting soil health and biodiversity’, while simultaneously handing out eye watering dividends to shareholders at the expense of workers’ rights.
If we want to tackle the intersecting issues that impact our food and farming system, then we must re-politicise agroecology and seek systemic change. This is why we have published the below statement which outlines what the LWA means by ‘agroecology’, re-rooting it as a social movement and a site of political struggle.